Fabrykiewicz Pawel
Effectiveness
Personal Bests
| Result | Date | Competition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snatch | 135.00 | 2019-03-22 | POL — Puławy |
| C&J | 165.00 | 2019-03-22 | POL — Puławy |
| Total | 300.00 | 2019-03-22 | POL — Puławy |
Competition history
| Date | Type | Weight | Sn1 | Sn2 | Sn3 | MAX Sn | Pl Sn | CJ1 | CJ2 | CJ3 | MAX CJ | Pl CJ | Total | Pl. Total | Sinclair |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-26 | POL — Bilgoraj | 88.1 | 125 | 130 | 135 | 130 | 7 | 151 | 160 | 0 | 160 | 6 | 290 | 7 | 338.66 |
| 2020-11-26 | POL — Bilgoraj | 88.1 | 125 | 130 | 135 | 130 | 5 | 151 | 160 | 0 | 160 | 4 | 290 | 5 | 338.66 |
| 2019-06-21 | POL — Ciechanów | 87.6 | 130 | 135 | 135 | 130 | 3 | 156 | 160 | 160 | 156 | 5 | 286 | 5 | 334.85 |
| 2019-04-27 | LC — Raszyn | 87.3 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 0 | 125 | 140 | 150 | 150 | 0 | 260 | 0 | 304.89 |
| 2019-03-22 | POL — Puławy | 89.5 | 130 | 135 | 135 | 135 | 2 | 160 | 165 | 167 | 165 | 3 | 300 | 2 | 347.89 |
| 2019-02-23 | LC — Ciechanów | 85.4 | 130 | 130 | 135 | 130 | 0 | 150 | 155 | 160 | 155 | 0 | 285 | 0 | 337.63 |
| 2018-09-01 | LC — Warszawa | 89 | 115 | 115 | 125 | 125 | 0 | 135 | 145 | 150 | 150 | 0 | 275 | 0 | 319.69 |
| 2018-04-29 | LC — Nowy Tomyśl | 83.5 | 105 | 105 | 115 | 115 | 0 | 130 | 135 | 140 | 140 | 0 | 255 | 0 | 305.35 |
| 2018-04-13 | POL — Mrocza | 83.5 | 110 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 7 | 135 | 140 | 146 | 140 | 6 | 260 | 6 | 311.34 |
| 2018-02-25 | LC — Mrocza | 84 | 115 | 120 | 125 | 120 | 0 | 140 | 145 | 145 | 145 | 0 | 265 | 0 | 316.41 |
| 2017-12-02 | XX — Nowy Dwór Gdański | 84.1 | 110 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 4 | 135 | 140 | 145 | 140 | 6 | 260 | 4 | 325.26 |
| 2017-05-20 | LC — Grudziądz | 81.3 | 100 | 105 | 110 | 110 | 0 | 125 | 130 | 0 | 130 | 0 | 240 | 0 | 291.21 |
| 2017-04-28 | POL — Łuków | 81.9 | 115 | 120 | 125 | 120 | 5 | 135 | 135 | 140 | 135 | 6 | 255 | 6 | 308.27 |
| 2017-03-04 | LC — Mrocza | 81.7 | 115 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 130 | 135 | 140 | 135 | 0 | 255 | 0 | 308.65 |
| 2016-09-10 | LC — Radomsko | 81.6 | 100 | 105 | 105 | 100 | 0 | 120 | 125 | 127 | 127 | 0 | 227 | 0 | 276.98 |
| 2016-07-07 | POL — Nowa Ruda | 81 | 115 | 120 | 125 | 125 | 3 | 140 | 145 | 148 | 145 | 4 | 270 | 3 | 330.73 |
| 2016-06-11 | XX — Bydgoszcz | 82.1 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 2 | 140 | 145 | 145 | 145 | 2 | 265 | 3 | 322.32 |
| 2016-05-28 | LC — Nowy Tomysl | 83.2 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 140 | 145 | 150 | 150 | 0 | 270 | 0 | 326.15 |
| 2016-05-05 | XX — Zamość | 82.4 | 122 | 126 | 126 | 126 | 2 | 145 | 150 | 156 | 150 | 2 | 276 | 2 | 335.06 |
| 2016-03-12 | LC — Gruta | 81.5 | 110 | 120 | 120 | 110 | 0 | 140 | 145 | 150 | 150 | 0 | 260 | 0 | 317.45 |
| 2015-09-18 | LC — Melno | 80.2 | 110 | 110 | 120 | 110 | 0 | 125 | 130 | 140 | 140 | 0 | 250 | 0 | 307.85 |
| 2015-07-09 | POL — Ciechanow | 83.3 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015-06-20 | LC — Melno | 83.4 | 112 | 117 | 122 | 122 | 0 | 135 | 145 | 145 | 145 | 0 | 267 | 0 | 322.14 |
| 2015-05-23 | LC — Mysliborz | 83.8 | 115 | 120 | 125 | 115 | 0 | 135 | 140 | 145 | 145 | 0 | 260 | 0 | 312.93 |
| 2015-05-15 | XX — Siedlce | 83.4 | 117 | 122 | 127 | 122 | 2 | 140 | 147 | 152 | 147 | 1 | 269 | 2 | 324.55 |
| 2015-05-09 | LC — Radomsko | 84.2 | 115 | 120 | 125 | 120 | 0 | 132 | 137 | 137 | 137 | 0 | 257 | 0 | 308.58 |
| 2014-10-16 | POL — Biłgoraj | 80.1 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 3 | 125 | 133 | 136 | 133 | 2 | 243 | 2 | 299.43 |
| 2014-05-24 | LC — Malbork | 75.6 | 90 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 107 | 112 | 115 | 115 | 0 | 215 | 0 | 273.6 |
| 2014-04-04 | XX — Siedlce | 75.4 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014-03-16 | LC — Bydgoszcz | 76.9 | 90 | 95 | 100 | 95 | 0 | 110 | 115 | 117 | 117 | 0 | 212 | 0 | 267.17 |
| 2013-10-04 | POL — Małaszewice | 77.1 | 90 | 95 | 95 | 90 | 4 | 110 | 115 | 115 | 110 | 6 | 200 | 6 | 251.68 |
| 2013-03-09 | XX — Grudziadz | 70.3 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 3 | 185 | 3 | 245.95 |
